Did NYT break Sandusky judge’s order? Twitter debates contempt charges

As we noted tonight, the judge in the Jerry Sandusky child molestation trial ordered media outlets to wait until court was adjourned to transit the verdict.

According to Twitter buzz, local journos believe the New York Yimes ignored the rules.

Here was the NYTimes tweet announcing the verdict at 10:08pm Eastern:

NYT NEWS ALERT: Sandusky Is Found Guilty on 45 of 48 Counts in Child Sexual Abuse Case

— The New York Times (@nytimes) June 23, 2012

Will there be consequences?

@darrenrovell A contempt charge could be brought against the New York Times if they violated the judge's orders.

— Alicia Jessop (@RulingSports) June 23, 2012

Looks like a broken rule, but nonetheless. RT @nytimes: NEWS ALERT: Sandusky Is Found Guilty on 45 of 48 Counts in Child Sexual Abuse Case

— Dustin Hockensmith (@dhockensmith) June 23, 2012

Tweet penalty? RT @ProducerMatthew Local media in Pa reporting NYT broke rule not to report on counts before court was adjourned

— darren rovell (@darrenrovell) June 23, 2012

So much for that judge's order RT @elisewho: : RT @nytimes: NYT NEWS ALERT: Sandusky Is Found Guilty on 45 of 48 Counts

— Brad Willis (@BradWillis) June 23, 2012

https://twitter.com/schwincat05/status/216356665040191490

@sbnation @nytimes Uh, the @nytimes source is gonna be held in contempt if that's accurate and a bailiff is gonna get fired.

— Kevin Clark (@kevinmclark) June 23, 2012

So how long before New York Times is held in contempt?

— Joshua Campbell (@CampbellJD) June 23, 2012

Fishwrap of Record motto: Rules for thee, but not for NYT.

Some observers are cheering the Times:

Good on the Times, either way. Judge should know, you can't muzzle news in the 21st Century.

— Matthew Keys (@MatthewKeysLive) June 23, 2012

@ProducerMatthew I still find it ridiculous issuing the gag order. On high profile cases they should have court audio.

— Ryan Olsen (@rkolsen) June 23, 2012

FYI:

The @nytimes tweet breaking news of the verdict has already been retweeted over 7,000 times. (via @pbump)

— Michael Rusch (@weeddude) June 23, 2012

Read more: http://twitchy.com/2012/06/22/buzz-did-new-york-times-break-sandusky-judges-order-on-verdict-and-will-the-paper-be-held-in-contempt/

About Imtu

Website: http://buzzworldnews.com

Related Articles

Share this Article:

Advertisement

feadback0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Some More Similar Post: